Survey says: Nebby neighbors are the worst |
More Lifestyles

Survey says: Nebby neighbors are the worst

Touchstone Pictures
Earl Hindman starred as neighbor Wilson on ABC's sitcom 'Home Improvment' in the 1990s.

Mister Rogers’s beloved TV show used to include the song “Won’t You Be My Neighbor?” But based on a new survey by Porch, a site that connects homeowners and professional contractors, not everyone gets along with their neighbors.

Porch’s survey of more than 1,000 people found that the worst neighbors are nosy neighbors — those who cross the line of a friendly wave into peeping into other’s yards, getting too personal when meeting at the mailbox or just a general invasion of privacy.

The other top four annoying activities of neighbors include those who are too loud, who don’t pick up after their pets, who park in someone else’s designated spot or who leave their children unsupervised.

Rounding out the list of the top 10 most annoying things neighbors do:

• Call the police on another neighbor.

• Leave notes on a neighbor’s door instead of speaking face-to-face.

• Have loud sex.

• Visibly walk around in various states of undress.

• Have landscaping or other items that obstruct a neighbor’s view.

Porch’s survey found that baby boomers are more likely to get into fights with their neighbors than young people. Thirty-three percent of baby boomers admitted to getting into aggressive verbal or even physical confrontations with a neighbor, compared with 23 percent of millennials and 28 percent of Gen Xers.

While the people Porch surveyed called out their neighbors for bad behavior, they were also willing to admit their own faults. One in 10 admitted to playing music too loudly or talking loudly enough that it might annoy their neighbors.

And 22 percent said they don’t know the names of any of their neighbors, while 61 percent said they know the names of only some of their neighbors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.