Are there ghosts? Paranormal documentary at Oaks claims to have proof |
More Lifestyles

Are there ghosts? Paranormal documentary at Oaks claims to have proof

Documentarian and paranormal investigator Chad Calek

Documentarian and paranormal investigator Chad Calek will bring his new film, “Sir Noface Lives,” to the Oaks Theater in Oakmont on Aug. 21.

The documentary chronicles the Australian government-sanctioned paranormal investigation of Cockatoo Island, conducted by Craig Powell of the West Sydney Paranormal Research Team. The film claims to show a full-body apparition that proves the existence of ghosts.

The “Sir Noface Lives” tour, hosted by Calek and producer Justin Holstein, includes a presentation of Calek and Holstein’s most compelling evidence gathered over the past 25 years, question and answer sessions, and two-hour VIP meet and greet dinner with the hosts.

Calek is best known for his autobiographical “American Ghost Hunter” documentary, which chronicled the Calek family’s 20-year battle with the paranormal, including Calek’s attempt to determine if his own mother’s alleged “possession” issues were authentic or merely a case of mistaken mental illness. “American Ghost Hunter” can be seen on Hulu.

Although known for capturing some of the most compelling evidence in the history of the paranormal field, Calek also developed a reputation as staunch “debunker” who has discovered rational explanations to many of the world’s most famous paranormal legends.

Calek was the co-star and director of A&E’s “Paranormal State,” which debuted in 2008 and ran for five seasons. He also starred in the network’s spin-off, “The Ghost Prophecies,” which documented his life as a professional filmmaker who doubles as a paranormal investigator. It co-starred Holstein.

JoAnne Klimovich Harrop is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-853-5062 or [email protected] or via Twitter @Jharrop_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.