‘A Comedy of Tenors’ is a farce, of course |
Theater & Arts

‘A Comedy of Tenors’ is a farce, of course

Apple Hill Playhouse staged one of Ken Ludwig’s comedies, “Lend Me a Tenor,” in 2006 with Ron Ferrara of Vandergrift in the director’s chair.

Ferrara also directed the farce for New Kensington Civic Theatre and led productions of other Ludwig shows, “Leading Ladies” and “Fox on the Fairway,” for Apple Hill and NKCT.

The veteran director’s knowledge of Ludwig’s fast-paced, over-the-top comedy style made him a logical choice for Apple Hill’s staging of “A Comedy of Tenors,” the sequel to “Lend Me a Tenor,” opening Sept. 20 at the Delmont theater.

Season-ending show

The show is the final production in Apple Hill’s 2018 mainstage summer season.

Up to this point, “I have always considered ‘Lend Me a Tenor’ Ludwig’s best work. Audiences loved his characters; however, this is not your typical sequel, and I have found ‘Comedy of Tenors’ just as funny, if not funnier,” Ferrara says.

Quick-witted comedy

Like all great farces, he says “Comedy of Tenors” includes elements of mistaken identity, romance, tasteful sexiness and witty verbal exchanges.

“The audience finds Max (Mike Crosby), Saunders (Wes Paul), Tito (Ray Cygrymus) and Maria (Renee Ruzzi-Kern) two years later. They are joined by more terrific characters, played by Kaylyn Farneth, Jeff Johnston and Rachel Nicely,” Ferrara says.

In the play, the concert of the century is about to take place — if the producer (Saunders) can keep the renowned Italian opera tenor (Tito Merelli) and his wife (Maria) from causing chaos.

Ferrara says theatergoers should expect to laugh “as the actors display the boundless energy and athleticism so important in making a successful farce come to life.”

Candy Williams is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.