Woodland Hills student’s tooth knocked out by school officer, attorney says |

Woodland Hills student’s tooth knocked out by school officer, attorney says

Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Que'chawn Wade, a 14-year-old student at Woodland Hills High School attends a press conference hosted by lawyer Todd Hollis inside of his Downtown office on Wednesday, April 5, 2017. Wade was involved in an altercation with a school Resource Officer.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Attorney Todd Hollis speaks to the press about his client, Queshawn Wade, a 14-year-old student at Woodland Hills High School, on Wednesday, April 5, 2017. Wade was involved in an altercation with a school resource officer on Monday.

An attorney for a 14-year-old Woodland Hills High School student said Wednesday a Churchill police officer assigned to the school beat up the teen and knocked out one of his front teeth during an arrest.

The incident happened inside the school at 1:15 p.m. Monday, according to Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis. He said a medical team at UPMC Presbyterian reattached the tooth and the teen will need additional oral surgery for other injuries.

“How hard does a person have to hit a child to knock their tooth completely out of their mouth?” he said. “What does a child have to do to justify that response?”

Hollis identified the teen in a press release as Queshawn Wade. Wade attended a press conference Wednesday at Hollis’ Downtown office but did not address the media. He had a visible scrape on his left cheek.

Woodland Hills Superintendent Alan Johnson said the student was injured as he was being taken into custody by the school resource officer.

“I do understand that the student was injured. And that’s unfortunate,” Johnson said.

The student has since been suspended from school.

“My understanding was that this was an isolated incident,” Johnson said. He would not disclose any other details.

Churchill police did not return a phone call.

Woodland Hills School Board President Tara Reis and board member Jeff Hildebrand declined to comment. Hollis said the incident stemmed from accusations that Wade stole a phone from another student. He said officer Steve Shaulis questioned Wade and the conversation escalated into a fight after Shaulis called Wade a derogatory name for homosexuals.

“I don’t care if he stole the cellphone; I don’t care if the cellphone comes back missing,” Hollis said. “It does not justify getting his teeth knocked out of his mouth.”

The accusations come four months after Woodland High School Principal Kevin Murray was placed on leave when a controversial recording showed him threatening a special-education student. Murray did not report to the school for about six weeks during an investigation by the office of Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. In a letter to Johnson, Zappala called Murray’s actions “inappropriate and arguably threatening” but did not charge Murray with a crime.

Mike Manko, a spokesman for Zappala, said an investigation into the new allegations is underway.

“Our office is in receipt of the initial report from Churchill Police concerning this incident,” he said in a statement. “ As is always the case when there is police use of force to effectuate an arrest, our office will review this incident and share that review with the FBI.”

In Monday’s incident, Hollis said Shaulis punched Wade and threw him across the room inside Shaulis’ office at the school. He said Murray witnessed at least part of the fight and helped question Wade about the missing phone.

“He was punched in the teeth which is where his tooth fell out and then he was placed on his stomach where he was later arrested and handcuffed,” Hollis said. “At this point we don’t know what the charges are. He was taken to the hospital by ambulance.”

Murray’s attorney, Phil DiLucente, said in a statement Wednesday that Murray was not involved in the recent allegations.

“The allegations as framed today with respect to Principal Kevin Murray are completely incorrect and wrong,” DiLucente said. “My client was not involved in the incident and casting his name in this light with respect to the alleged incident is not only inflammatory but completely unnecessary and only done to damage his reputation.”

Hollis said there are video cameras that should show portions of the incident and challenged the school district to release the video.

“If you have nothing to hide you should show everything,” he said. “I could care less about the phone. The issue here right now is the assault of this young man.”

Hollis said he had the press conference Wednesday to inform the community about the allegations. He said he is considering legal action.

Ben Schmitt and Jamie Martines are Tribune-Review staff writers. Reach Schmitt at 412-320-7991 or [email protected]. Reach Martines at 724-850-2867 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.