Robotics meet in Pittsburgh brings together startups and heavy-hitters |

Robotics meet in Pittsburgh brings together startups and heavy-hitters

Aaron Aupperlee
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Gary Fedder, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University's Robotics Institute and the interim CEO of the Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute speaks to reporters at the institute's kick-off meeting at the National Robotics Engineering Center in Lawrenceville on Wednesday, April 12, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Attendants of the Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute kick-off meeting wait for speakers to begin at the National Robotics Engineering Center in Lawrenceville on Wednesday, April 12, 2017.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Greg Hudas, a Department of Defense employee and the program manager for Manufacturing USA, speaks at the Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute's kick-off meeting National Robotics Engineering Center in Lawrenceville on Wednesday, April 12, 2017.

Partnerships that government officials and roboticists said they hope will move the United States to the forefront of robotic manufacturing started to form Wednesday in Pittsburgh.

More than 200 representatives of U.S. companies and universities met at the National Robotics Engineering Center in Lawrenceville for the first major meetings of the Advanced Robotics for Manufacturing Institute, known as ARM.

Representatives from mammoth companies such as Airbus, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Amazon and Wal-Mart sat next to the founders and CEOs of Pittsburgh robotic startups such as IAM Robotics and RE2 Robotics and staff from top universities and community colleges.

“You’re all prospective members of ARM,” Gary Fedder, the institute’s interim CEO, said Wednesday at the start of two days of recruitment and planning activities.

The institute is the latest of 14 such centers across the United States meant to advance domestic manufacturing. It will run on $80 million in federal money for the next five years plus an expected $173 million in funding and in-kind contributions from companies and universities.

The Department of Defense announced in January that it would base its advanced robotics institute at Carnegie Mellon University. Fedder said the institute is hiring staff and will start bringing on members in the next two weeks.

“This is a wonderful opportunity that we have in front of us,” said Howie Choset, the institute’s chief technology officer and a professor in Carnegie Mellon’s Robotics Institute who worked on the university’s petition for the institute. “We’re all just happy and excited to get started.”

Greg Hudas, a Department of Defense employee who is the project manager of the 14 manufacturing institutes, said work at the robotics institute will help the United States catch up to China, Germany, Japan and other countries that have outpaced America in manufacturing. Catching up through robotics will bring manufacturing jobs back to America, Hudas said, and could create more jobs than are replaced by automation.

Hudas said the institute will focus on innovations in the automotive industry, textiles, electronics and the medical field. Programs from the institute could start at the end of the summer, Hudas said. Those early efforts will include education programs at the K-12 and college levels and training and retraining opportunities at community colleges, universities and tech schools. Hudas said to expect to see robots in small businesses.

“We feel the time is right for this technology to actually increase jobs,” Hudas said. “We’re No. 1 in the world when it comes to innovation and technology. We need to be No. 1 again in manufacturing.”

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach Aupperlee at [email protected] or 412-336-8448.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.