ShareThis Page
Allegheny County cancels unadvertised council meeting on lead testing |

Allegheny County cancels unadvertised council meeting on lead testing

| Wednesday, April 26, 2017 5:39 p.m.

Allegheny County Council canceled an unadvertised meeting that it scheduled for Wednesday afternoon about a proposal to require the county’s children to be tested for lead.

The Tribune-Review questioned the legality of the meeting in a story published Tuesday . The Pennsylvania Sunshine Act requires public agencies to provide at least 24 hours’ notice before holding meetings of a quorum of elected officials by advertising in a newspaper.

The county didn’t advertise Wednesday’s meeting.

Jared Barker, council’s chief clerk and director of legislative services, said he did not know why the meeting was canceled or whether it would be rescheduled with a public notice.

County Solicitor Jack Cambest could not immediately be reached for comment Wednesday.

On Tuesday, Cambest told the Trib that the county didn’t need to advertise the meeting because it was meant to be “purely informational.”

“No proposed regulation has been submitted to council. No regulation has been finalized by the health department. No agency business or deliberation will be undertaken at the meeting. If and when a regulation is submitted, the proper (advertisement) will be made,” Cambest said in an email.

Although public agencies aren’t required under the Sunshine Act to advertise informational meetings at which no agency business is discussed or deliberated, Melissa Melewsky, the Pennsylvania NewsMedia Association’s media law counsel, said it’s in the county’s interest to put out a public notice.

“It’s better to advertise these meetings as public and just welcome the public in. That would remove all of these questions from constituents’ minds,” Melewsky said.

At the meeting, county Health Department staffers planned to brief council members about a proposal to require all of the county’s children to undergo blood screening for lead at ages 1 and 2.

The proposal has been introduced to the county’s Board of Health, which plans to vote on it May 3. If passed, it will go to council for final approval.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669 or Follow her on Twitter via @tclift.

This story has been updated to identify the government agency considering the proposal.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.