Woodland Hills ‘youth development’ group to improve campus climate after violence |

Woodland Hills ‘youth development’ group to improve campus climate after violence

Natasha Lindstrom
Pittsburgh attorney Todd Hollis released a video to the media from March 3, 2015, that shows an incident inside Woodland Hills High School student involving a then-14-year-old student and Churchill Police Officer Steve Shaulis and Principal Kevin Murray.

Woodland Hills School District on Wednesday announced a new commission tasked with studying how to improve the climate of its campuses, improve public trust in the district and ease tensions spurred by violent altercations caught on video between staff and students.

“We know that the community has a lot of questions, concerns,” Woodland Hills Superintendent Alan Johnson told the Tribune-Review.

“We believe that the only way we’re going to address this comprehensively is not to dwell on the video, or the one or two incidents, or three incidents,” he continued. “The problems that exist are much deeper. They’re systemic, and they go to how we relate to kids.”

Officials are tapping 15 to 20 community volunteers — parents, teachers, clergy, business professionals, law enforcement and community leaders — to serve on the independent body known as the Woodland Hills Commission on Youth Development.

Two co-chairs were named Wednesday: Karen Farmer White, education advocate and a former vice president of education at WQED Multimedia; and Jerry Zahorchak, a retired superintendent and former Pennsylvania education secretary from 2006-10.

Johnson said the remaining members will be determined by next week.

The commission has five focus areas: student equity, diversity, relationship- and community-building, school climate and graduation rates.

Over the summer, members will review disciplinary policies and procedures at campuses district-wide and make recommendations in August.

Woodland Hills made national headlines after a Pittsburgh attorney released videos from Woodland Hills High School surveillance cameras that showed the arrests of two black students by a white Churchill police officer assigned to the school.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. said last month that arrest tactics by a police officer assigned to the high school could have civil rights implications .

About a month ago, Woodland High School Principal Kevin Murray sent a letter to parents lamenting that “the emotional climate of Woodland Hills is not ideal right now, and I am not sure that it ever has been.”

Woodland Hills is the product of a court-ordered merger of a large, predominantly black school district with four predominantly white ones in the eastern suburbs in 1981. Today’s district includes 12 communities.

The newly formed commission will likely meet in private, Johnson said, but members will welcome input from anyone who is “solution-oriented and forward-thinking” and wants to contribute to the district’s “long-range strategic plan.”

Reach the commission at [email protected]

Staff writer Jamie Martines contributed. Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.