Legislation allowing PWSA to replace private lead lines advances |

Legislation allowing PWSA to replace private lead lines advances

Bob Bauder
Thomas Eshenbaugh | For the Tribune-Review
This lead water pipe inside a house connects the home’s plumbing to the main water pipes.

Pittsburgh City Council on Wednesday advanced legislation that would allow the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority to replace private residential water lines made of lead and require home sellers to disclose the existence of lead lines to buyers.

The city is circumventing a 2011 Commonwealth Court ruling that effectively prohibits PWSA from replacing privately owned water lines by declaring the situation a public safety hazard, according to Kevin Acklin, Mayor Bill Peduto’s chief of staff.

State and city laws permit the city to rectify public safety hazards, Acklin said.

“We think we have the police power under city code to empower the public safety director and the mayor to enter into contracts with private homeowners … to remove the (private) lead lines,” Acklin said during a meeting with City Council.

Officials believe that 25 percent of PWSA’s 71,000 water service lines are made of lead. PWSA lines run from water mains to a “curb box” connection on a private property. Under existing regulations, the property owner is responsible for the line running from the box into the home.

PWSA and Pittsburgh intends to replace all lead lines over a period of years.

Acklin said the city is seeking a low-interest loan from the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority to help cover the estimated $410 million cost.

A homeowner would have to volunteer for water line replacement and could be asked to pay at least part of the cost based on income level. The owner would be responsible for repairs to landscaping and interior damage at their property after lines are replaced.

The city could offer grants or low-interest loans for lead line replacement to homeowners, Acklin said.

“For poor residents of the city, we think that should be free,” he said.

A separate ordinance would require residents who are selling homes built before 1970 to perform a “scratch test” of water lines where they enter a water meter and disclose the existence of lead lines to potential buyers or renters.

The test requires an owner to scratch the surface of a water line to clearly identify pipe material. The owner must photograph the pipe and send the photograph to PWSA, which can determine if it’s made of lead.

Owners must disclose the existence of lead lines during the closing of a property sale or via a rental agreement, according to the legislation.

“Both here at (council) and at PWSA we are committed to zero lead,” said Councilwoman Deb Gross of Highland Park, who swerves on the PWSA board. “That means zero lead in the lines and at all parcels across the city.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.