ShareThis Page
State Rep. Gergely, Pittsburgh attorney plead guilty to gambling ring involvement |

State Rep. Gergely, Pittsburgh attorney plead guilty to gambling ring involvement

| Tuesday, August 15, 2017 11:42 a.m.
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Tribune-Review
State Rep. Marc Gergely

State Rep. Marc Gergely pleaded guilty Tuesday to two misdemeanor charges related to his part in an illegal gambling machine ring.

Gergely, a White Oak Democrat representing the 35th District in eastern Allegheny County, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and accepting illegal campaign contributions related to the March 2016 charges filed by the state Attorney General’s office.

Pittsburgh attorney Louis Caputo also pleaded guilty in the same hearing, to one count of criminal solicitation related to illegal gambling devices.

Caputo, originally facing two additional charges of conspiracy and dealing in illegal gambling devices, was sentenced to five years of probation. Sentencing for Gergely, who remains in office, is set for Nov. 6.

House Democratic Leader Frank Dermody said Tuesday afternoon that he’d not yet spoken with Gergely about what comes next for the representative.

“It’s good that (Gergely) took responsibility for his conduct by admitting to his harmful actions, and he will soon face the judgement of the court,” Dermody said in a statement. “That’s the right result.”

The attorney and state representative were charged during a state investigation into Ronald “Porky” Melocchi, who ran an illegal gambling ring through his Glassport business, Back Alley Vending.

The 2016 statewide grand jury indictment alleged Gergely used his position and influence to attempt to assuage the fears of business owners who were leery of putting Melocchi’s gambling machines in their establishments.

The saga dates to Oct. 10, 2012, when Gergely and Caputo sat down with McKeesport restaurant owner Theresa Ploskina to vouch for Melocchi, whom Gergely called “a good guy” with whom to do business, according to the indictment. Ploskina’s Dot’s Family Restaurant had been raided three times for illegal machines, and she’d been arrested and fined.

Melocchi called Gergely and Caputo his “super PAC” — heavy-hitters who carried enough clout to persuade small business owners to allow the machines in their businesses.

Officials had Melocchi’s cellphone tapped and recorded him boasting about Gergely and Caputo’s work for him. The indictment alleged that Caputo used a source deep within the Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement to identify a man who repeatedly ratted out Ploskina.

Melocchi’s ring was worth more than $1 million when authorities raided it in 2013. He pleaded guilty in 2014 and was sentenced last year to 10 years of probation.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter at @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.