Archive

Jury deliberating in 2nd day of Leon Ford police shooting trial | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Jury deliberating in 2nd day of Leon Ford police shooting trial

The Associated Press
ptrford30916214
Guy Wathen | Trib Total Media
Leon Ford, left, his father Leon Ford Sr., and mother Latonya Green are all smiles after a jury rendered a partial verdict finding Ford not guilty of aggravated assault at the Allegheny County Courthouse on Monday, Sept. 15, 2014.

A federal court jury has begun deliberating a second day in the civil rights trial of a lawsuit filed by a black motorist who was paralyzed by a white Pittsburgh police officer during a traffic stop.

Twenty-four-year-old Leon Ford is suing Officers David Derbish and Anthony Miller for the November 2012 traffic stop that saw Derbish shoot Ford five times. Miller’s being sued for assault and battery.

Ford claims the officers mistook him for a gang member with a similar name, age and appearance and treated him aggressively.

The officers contend Ford resisted when they tried to pull him out of the car to frisk him and that Derbish fired only because Ford drove away with Derbish kneeling and struggling with Ford in the car. Ford claims the car was inadvertently knocked into gear.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.