McKeesport councilwoman is GOP nominee in Mon Valley state House race |
Politics Election

McKeesport councilwoman is GOP nominee in Mon Valley state House race

Wesley Venteicher
Cindy Shegan Keeley | Trib Total Media
McKeesport Councilwoman V. Fawn Walker-Montgomery, the Republican party's nominee for the 35th District in the Mon Valley, moderates a 2015 talk involving law enforcement officers and residents of Auberle.

McKeesport Councilwoman Fawn Walker-Montgomery is the Republican Party’s nominee for a special election next month to represent the Mon Valley in the state House.

Walker-Montgomery, 37, will face off Jan. 23 against Austin Davis, a local Democratic Party leader and assistant to Allegheny County Executive Rich Fitzgerald.

“In the Mon Valley, I feel like we’re always left out,” Walker-Montgomery said. “We really need a strong advocate in Harrisburg advocating for us and making sure we’re not left out.”

Republican committee members selected her at a Wednesday night meeting at Rainbow Temple Assembly of God Church in McKeesport.

The special election is being held to replace former Rep. Marc Gergely, a Democrat from White Oak who resigned Nov. 6 after pleading guilty in August to two misdemeanor charges related to his role in an illegal gambling machine ring.

The 35th legislative district includes McKeesport, Munhall, White Oak, Clairton, Duquesne, Versailles, Whitaker, Lincoln, South Versailles and part of West Mifflin.

Walker-Montgomery said she holds traditional Republican views on abortion and the second amendment. She said she is focused on reducing crime, bringing family-sustaining jobs to the region and fighting the opioid epidemic.

She said she was the first black woman to run for the 35th district seat, when she lost to Gergely by 25 percentage points in 2016.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.