Archive

Sonja Finn wins Democratic nomination for vacant Pittsburgh council seat | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Sonja Finn wins Democratic nomination for vacant Pittsburgh council seat

Natasha Lindstrom
ptrFinn011517
Sonja Finn

Point Breeze chef and restaurant owner Sonja Finn won the Democratic nomination Sunday for the March 6 special election for a seat on Pittsburgh City Council.

“I’m very excited, happy, honored,” Finn, 38, said shortly after the vote was tallied at Chatham University’s Coolidge Hall.

“I think people know that I’ve been committed to this city,” added Finn, who opened Dinette pizzeria and wine bar in Pittsburgh’s East Liberty neighborhood a decade ago. “I’ve showed that I get things done.”

Fewer than 50 people participated in the nomination process, with 27 casting votes in favor of Finn to replace former Councilman Dan Gilman, Democratic committee members said. Seventy-three committee members from Council District 8 were eligible to vote.

“In 34 years, I’ve never been a part of anything like this,” said longtime committee member Claire Staples, 69, a retired electrician of Squirrel Hill. “But this is the way it’s done. It’s always been done this way. The most powerful thing a Democratic committee member can do is get to vote in one of these races — you could spend your whole life on committee and never get to do it.”

State law permits major political parties to nominate candidates in lieu of a primary election. Independent candidates can run by circulating and filing nomination papers.

No Republican candidates have surfaced. The district includes Shadyside and parts of Point Breeze, Squirrel Hill and Oakland.

The seat is open because Gilman resigned Jan. 3 to serve as Mayor Bill Peduto’s chief of staff.

Finn had competed against Erika Strassburger, 35, of Squirrel Hill, Gilman’s former chief of staff, who received 20 votes; and Marty Healey, 54, of Shadyside, chief financial officer for a South Side-based construction firm, who received no votes.

Strassburger said she plans to continue to run as an independent.

“While 47 people voted today, there are many, many more voters in the community who I am I excited to talk to about my campaign,” she said in a statement. “I have truly loved every minute of being a public servant for District 8 for the last four years and would be honored to continue that service on City Council.”

Healey’s campaign had criticized the timing of the nominations, saying it didn’t permit adequate time to campaign. The nominating vote was held 11 days after Gilman resigned.

The law requires nominations to be conducted within 15 days of the city notifying the Allegheny County Elections Division of the vacancy, said elections Manager Mark Wolosik.

Finn, whose campaign platforms include support for universal preschool, raising the minimum wage and rethinking citywide development, was “like a breath of fresh air” during last week’s candidate meet-and-greet, Staples said of why she voted for her.

“She’s smart, she understands how this city is working and she’s not connected to anybody,” Staples said. “She’s an entrepreneur — she’s the kind of person who is making this city what it is today.”

The special election winner will serve a four-year term. City Council members are paid $66,371 a year.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or on Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.