Archive

ShareThis Page
Penn Hills man indicted on 8 counts of child exploitation, porn | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Penn Hills man indicted on 8 counts of child exploitation, porn

webcourts3
Metrocreative

A federal grand jury has accused a Penn Hills man of producing and distributing pornography depicting children younger than 12, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady announced Tuesday.

John O’Donnell, 50, has been charged with the attempted production, distribution and possession of material depicting the sexual exploitation of minors.

The grand jury issued its indictment last week, and officials arrested O’Donnell on Friday, according to Brady.

On Tuesday, a judge ordered that O’Donnell continue to be detained pending trial, Brady said.

Between February and April 2015, O’Donnell allegedly coerced a child to engage in sexual activity and recorded it “for the purpose of producing or attempting to produce a visual depiction of the sexual exploitation of the minor,” according to the eight-count indictment.

In October of last year, O’Donnell “knowingly distributed” videos and images of sexually explicit content involving children, some of whom were younger than 12, the indictment said.

He allegedly also possessed similar files depicting child porn in late December.

If convicted, O’Donnell faces up to 210 years in prison, a fine of $1 million or both, federal prosecutors said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Shanicka L. Kennedy is prosecuting the case with help from the FBI, state Attorney General’s Office, Allegheny County police and the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

Prosecutors said they advanced the case with resources made available through Project Safe Childhood , a Department of Justice initiative started in 2006 aimed at curbing child sexual exploitation and abuse.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-8514, nlindstrom@tribweb.com or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.