ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh councilwoman says anti-harassment bill is ‘feel-good legislation’ |

Pittsburgh councilwoman says anti-harassment bill is ‘feel-good legislation’

File photos
Pittsburgh City Council members Theresa Kail-Smith and Darlene Harris.

Two Pittsburgh City Council members on Wednesday said they’ve been harassed by their peers on numerous occasions and that a proposed “feel-good” bill requiring mandatory anti-harassment training would do nothing to address it.

Under the legislation sponsored by council President Bruce Kraus, all employees — including council, the mayor and city controller — would have to attend anti-harassment training sessions each year.

Councilman Ricky Burgess of Homewood said the training would be good for employees, but he said the city can’t force elected officials to attend.

“Let’s be honest,” Burgess said. “We’re elected by the people. You can’t make us do it. We don’t have to do it, and some of us won’t do it, and (those) of us who do it won’t practice it.”

Councilwomen Darlene Harris of Spring Hill and Theresa Kail-Smith of Westwood said they’ve experienced and witnessed incidents of harassment by other council members. They noted that Pittsburgh already has a zero-tolerance ordinance prohibiting harassment.

“I have seen more harassment on this floor than I’ve seen in this entire city,” Kail-Smith said, adding that it has included holding back projects for council districts and nasty emails and text messages. “There’s a lot of stuff that goes on here that would fall under harassment in a private workplace, but in here it’s an accepted practice. … I think everyone thinks this is feel-good legislation. It sounds great.”

Neither she nor Harris would identify officials they think are guilty of harassment, but Harris has previously accused Kraus of taking a Nativity set she displayed in council offices at Christmas.

“I think he needs a six-week course on it himself,” Harris said.

The two have battled repeatedly during meetings, and Kraus once fined Harris for being out of order after accusing her of tossing a gavel at him.

Kraus did not respond to a message seeking comment.

During the meeting, Kraus urged members to approve the bill.

“Whether it be sexual orientation, whether it be age, whether it be gender, we will stand up, step up and insist that we as employers here in the city of Pittsburgh are leaders in promoting civil and harassment-free workplaces,” he said.

Council approved the training by a 6-0 preliminary vote. Kail-Smith abstained, saying she wanted more details, and Councilman Daniel Lavelle was absent. There is one vacancy on the nine-member council.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312, or via Twitter@bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.