Archive

Allegheny County certifies election results, Conor Lamb’s victory | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County certifies election results, Conor Lamb’s victory

ptrlambclose031418
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
A confident Conor Lamb speaks to his supporters after a special congressional district election at the Hilton Garden Inn at Southpointe in Cecil in the early morning hours of March 14, 2018.

The Allegheny County Board of Elections certified vote tallies Monday for last month’s special congressional election, making Democrat Conor Lamb’s victory official.

The certification followed the filing and withdrawing of several challenges to provisional ballots that were counted in the weeks after the March 13 election. Allegheny’s certification this week followed certifications last week by Westmoreland, Washington and Greene counties.

Republican Rick Saccone conceded the race March 21. Lamb won by 755 votes, according to final results, with 227,449 votes cast in the election.

The House returns to session April 10 after a two-week recess.

Lamb won 58,874 votes in Allegheny County to Saccone’s 43,398 votes. Libertarian Drew Miller won 526 votes, according to the county’s tally.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.