ShareThis Page
Port Authority of Allegheny County nixes cashless fare system for light rail |

Port Authority of Allegheny County nixes cashless fare system for light rail

Port Authority of Allegheny County is nixing a plan to make its light-rail system “cashless,” and with it, a controversial plan to use officers for fare enforcement.

Only about 2 to 3 percent of T riders are not paying to ride the T, Port Authority staff found during the last few months, Port Authority CEO Katharine Eagan Kelleman said.

“This tells us that our current, accepted method of payment is working and we all know the expression ‘if it’s not broke don’t fix it,’” Kelleman said.

The authority previously announced the system would go cashless starting in July, but it has been repeatedly delayed as the authority waits for a contractor to deliver ConnectCard machines.

A cashless system would be problematic for riders who don’t have a bank account and for light-rail stations where there is no room to install a ConnectCard machine, Kelleman said.

“So what do we do if we know we have a station where we can’t solve the cash issue? And I think we default on the side of taking care of our patrons,” Kelleman said.

Nixing the idea also keeps the authority’s 47 police officers available to respond to other issues, Kelleman said.

The authority will keep its 18 off-board fare officers stationed at the system’s busiest T stations, Kelleman said.

At unstaffed stations, riders tap their cards or pay with cash on the train behind the operator.

“It’s the same thing we do with our 720 buses around the system, so we know it’s something folks are comfortable with,” Kelleman said.

To prepare for the switch to cashless, the authority has purchased and installed “validator” machines in several Downtown stations, said Adam Brandolph, Port Authority spokesman.

The machines, which allow riders to tap before getting on or after getting on the train, have not been activated, Brandolph said.

The machines might be used, even if the T is not cashless, to allow riders to board faster without a line forming on the train while riders wait to tap their cards, Brandolph said.

The effort to find out how many riders were paying began on Kelleman’s first day in January, she said.

“When I came on board, our board was very focused on the idea of how many folks are paying their fare or not and what’s the best way to make sure we have our hands around them,” Kelleman said.

Although it took time, the board is responsive, Port Authority Board Chairman Jeff Letwin said Friday.

Advocacy groups have been raising concerns for nearly a year that using officers for fare enforcement could result in racial profiling, excessive fines, jail time, and even deportation.

“We are glad they aren’t implementing a policy that would penalize and be overly punitive for riders with consequences as severe as jail time and deportation,” said Laura Wiens, director of Pittsburghers for Public Transit, which led the effort.

Under the policy proposed in April, first-time violators would have received a warning. On their second offense, they could have been charged with theft of services. Offenders caught three or more times could have been charged with trespassing and access device fraud.

The theft of services charge could carry a fine of up to $300 and 90 days in jail, as determined by a judge.

Staff will continue to monitor fare evasion to make sure the number of riders not paying does not increase, Kelleman said.

“Our big concern is making sure we are fair and equitable for everyone riding,” Kelleman said.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 412-380-5669, or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.