ShareThis Page
Another elections forecaster rates Rothfus-Lamb matchup a ‘toss-up’ |

Another elections forecaster rates Rothfus-Lamb matchup a ‘toss-up’

| Monday, May 21, 2018 4:00 p.m.
U.S. Reps. Keith Rothfus, R-Sewickley, and Conor Lamb, D-Mt. Lebanon

Inside Elections, a Washington, D.C.-based publication that forecasts congressional elections, has updated to “toss-up” its rating of the contest between Democratic Rep. Conor Lamb and Republican Rep. Keith Rothfus.

The publication previously designated Pennsylvania’s 17th Congressional District, where Lamb and Rothfus are campaigning, as tilting Republican. The district was one of 19 the publication shifted left, according to a Monday story published by Roll Call .

The district, which includes Beaver County along with parts of Allegheny and Butler counties, is the only district of 18 in the state the publication now rates a toss-up. The district was created when the state Supreme Court redrew congressional districts after ruling the old districts were unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit Republicans.

According to Inside Elections, 68 Republican seats and 10 Democratic seats are considered vulnerable this fall. Democrats need to win 23 seats to take the majority in the House.

The Cook Political Report, another elections forecaster, also rates the 17th District race a toss-up .

Lamb of Mt. Lebanon won a March 13 special election to replace former Rep. Tim Murphy, who resigned last fall amid an extramarital scandal. Rothfus of Sewickley is seeking a fourth term.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-380-5676, or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.