Attorney says ex-Pittsburgh police officer sent client ‘bizarre’ messages |

Attorney says ex-Pittsburgh police officer sent client ‘bizarre’ messages

Bob Bauder
Souroth Chatterji (via WPXI-TV)

A Pittsburgh police officer who resigned Monday sent a series of unsolicited phone and text messages to a woman after charging her in March with drunken driving, according to the woman’s attorney.

Attorney Allison Reynolds said former Officer Souroth Chatterji’s behavior toward her client Leanne Santiago, 38, of Lawrenceville was “bizarre” and “completely inappropriate.”

Reynolds said some of the messages were related to police business but others were not.

Chatterji’s attorney, Alec B. Wright, called the allegations “utterly baseless.”

“(Chatterji’s) contact and behavior in this case is really questionable,” Reynolds said. “He started contacting her via text message, phone and FaceTime. This was before she had counsel, and he knew it was inappropriate.”

She declined to describe the content of the messages but said Chatterji wished Santiago a happy Easter in one of them.

Wright said Pittsburgh police investigated and found no evidence of wrongdoing. Police Chief Scott Schubert and Public Safety Director Wendell Hissrich declined comment, citing an internal investigation.

“I have seen the text messages,” Wright said. “They’re utterly baseless.”

Chatterji, 33, in February filed a federal whistleblower lawsuit against Pittsburgh, alleging police brass harassed and threatened him over a controversial investigation into a Plum computer software company. City officials have denied the allegations.

Mayor Bill Peduto said he was unaware of the complaint against Chatterji but said officers should not contact suspects outside of police business.

“It would never be appropriate for an officer to contact a suspect in any manner outside of an investigation,” he said.

Beth Pittinger, who heads the Pittsburgh Citizen Police Review Board, said the messages could be viewed as official oppression, witness tampering or stalking.

“It would certainly qualify as an unbecoming conduct because that lady is going to lose her confidence in the Bureau of Police,” she said.

Chatterji resigned Monday without giving a reason, but he appeared Tuesday for Santiago’s preliminary hearing on the drunken driving charge in Pittsburgh Municipal Court.

Reynolds said Chatterji’s resignation came days after she delivered copies of his messages to the Pittsburgh Office of Municipal Investigations, which investigates complaints against city employees. Reynolds said she filed a complaint with OMI because of the messages.

Chatterji charged Santiago on March 2 with drunken driving, aggravated assault, impersonating a federal police officer and careless driving. He later withdrew the assault and impersonation charges.

According to a criminal complaint, Santiago failed to stop at a traffic signal near Market Square, Downtown, and nearly struck several children. Chatterji charged her after she failed a field sobriety test, according to the complaint. She allegedly told him that she was a federal police officer and later kicked another city police officer.

Santiago waived her right to a hearing Tuesday and her case will proceed in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 412-765-2312 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.