Archive

ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Promise graduates, local employers in line for $5,000 grants | TribLIVE.com
News

Pittsburgh Promise graduates, local employers in line for $5,000 grants

Pittsburgh City Councilman Corey O’Connor will distribute $5,000 grants Monday to six Pittsburgh Promise Scholarship alumni and three local businesses through a program established last year by City Council to retain homegrown talent.

Grants are going to Lauren Brown and The Children’s Institute of Pittsburgh; Joshua Devine and Fourth Economy Consulting; Jordan Olander and the Pittsburgh Three Rivers Marathon; Avram Chernoff, who is employed by the city; Karina Kasavich, employed by the Pittsburgh Public School District; and Abigail Lutton, employed by Allegheny County.

O’Connor said the local Promise graduates can use the funding to help pay off student debt. The Children’s Institute of Pittsburgh, Fouth Economy Consulting and Three Rivers Marathon will receive funding because they hired a Promise graduate. O’Connor said the government employers would not receive grants.

O’Connor of Swisshelm Park sponsored legislation last year that set aside funding for the program. Six Promise graduates and two local employers received grants in 2017.

To qualify, students had to graduate from an accredited institution through a promise scholarship and work full time in Pittsburgh. The employers had to hire a promise scholarship recipient full time and employ them for at least six months.


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.