ShareThis Page
TribLIVE readers react to Zappala’s stance on enforcement of abortion laws |

TribLIVE readers react to Zappala’s stance on enforcement of abortion laws

District Attorney of Allegheny County, Stephen A. Zappala.

Allegheny County District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr.’s prepared statement this week that he would not prosecute doctors who perform abortions or individuals who seek them should Roe v. Wade be overturned elicited dozens of comments from Trib readers on social media.

The majority did not appreciate Zappala’s stance and called him out for grandstanding and politicking for votes. He is up for re-election next year.

Zappala’s statement came a day after President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court. Many are speculating that Kavanaugh, a conservative judge who if confirmed would replace Justice Anthony Kennedy, could prove to be the pivotal vote if the highest court ever takes up Roe v. Wade.

Even if Kavanaugh is confirmed, it could be years before the court takes up Roe v. Wade and no guarantee it would.

In his 2006 confirmation hearing to become a federal judge, Kavanaugh said, “I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully” because it’s “binding precedent” that has been “reaffirmed many times.”

A sampling of what our readers are saying:

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.