ShareThis Page
Pair pleads guilty in 2015 slaying of Sharpsville man |

Pair pleads guilty in 2015 slaying of Sharpsville man

Getty Images

Two men pleaded guilty to third-degree murder Tuesday in connection with the 2015 killing of a Sharpsville man in Pittsburgh’s East Hills neighborhood, according to the Allegheny County District Attorney’s Office.

Deshawn Hall, 25, also pleaded guilty to attempted homicide, aggravated assault, conspiracy and two counts of robbery, said District Attorney spokesman Mike Manko. Raymon Harris, 25, pleaded guilty to robbery and conspiracy and pleaded no contest to attempted homicide and aggravated assault.

In exchange for his plea, Common Pleas Judge Anthony Mariani sentenced Hall to 30 to 60 years in prison. No sentencing arrangement was in place for Harris. He will be sentenced Oct. 9.

Both men were charged in August 2015 in the death of 22-year-old Dersean Alberty-Brown.

Alberty-Brown went to and East Hills home with three other men to buy marijuana from Hall and Harris, according to the criminal complaint filed at the time. Alberty-Brown was found shot to death in the house.

Hall and Harris attacked one of the men as he walked through the door of the Fahnestock Street home and riled through his shorts, the complaint stated. They found little money, and when they ordered Alberty-Brown into the house, he ran back toward the car.

Hall shot Alberty-Brown three times, according to the complaint, and he was pronounced dead a short time later at UPMC Presbyterian.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.