Penn State donors gave nearly $1 million a day |

Penn State donors gave nearly $1 million a day


Penn State University can apparently lay claim to raising nearly $1 million a day from donors.

University officials said the school that enrolled nearly 99,000 students across 20 campuses last year and boasts one of the nation’s largest alumni associations, raised a record setting $362.9 million during the 2017-18 school year.

That’s small beans in an annual budget approaching $6 billion a year and well in excess of the $327.4 million the state allocated to the state-related land grant university this year.

School officials said 221,700 donors stepped forward with gifts in the second year of a five-year fund raising campaign with a $1.6 billion goal.

Although many donors restrict their gifts to specific projects and programs, university officials said this fund raising campaign emphasized scholarships. It focused on 317 newly created scholarships known as the Open Door Scholarships. The new scholarship pool that reached $50.1 million with a 2-1 match from the university. It will benefit students in programs offering financial aid, mentoring and counseling and was designed to help students graduate on time with less debt.

Some of the largest gifts pledged this year included:

$46.8 million gift of software from Schlumberger, Penn State’s 2017 Corporate Partner of the Year, to benefit the Colleges of Engineering and Earth and Mineral Sciences.

$25 million grant from Highmark to advance efforts to secure National Cancer Institute designation for Penn State’s Cancer Institute.

A $5.5 million commitment from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to support global health research initiatives.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.