Allegheny County Jail inmate accused of raping a transgender prisoner |

Allegheny County Jail inmate accused of raping a transgender prisoner

Natasha Lindstrom
Taylor John Booth

An Allegheny County Jail inmate who identifies as a transgender woman has accused another inmate of sexually assaulting her while she slept in a cell, officials said.

Taylor John Booth, 21, of Pittsburgh has been charged with rape, indecent assault, unlawful restraint and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, a criminal complaint shows.

On Tuesday night, Booth was transferred into a cell that had previously been occupied by a single inmate, identified in the complaint under the pseudonym John Doe. John Doe told investigators that she identifies as transgender and is known by a female alias.

Before “lights out,” the two talked briefly about how Booth had “ended up in jail because of a domestic with his roommate,” the unidentified victim later told officials.

Court records show that Booth was arrested on May 7 on a misdemeanor charge of “prohibited acts.”

The victim said that after falling asleep on the bottom bunk, she was awakened by Booth sexually assaulting her before raping her.

The victim said she said no and cried while Booth remained “aggressive” and refused to stop.

John Doe reported the sexual assault about 1:20 p.m Wednesday and was provided medical treatment, the complaint said.

Booth initially denied the accusation. When investigators said the cell would be processed for forensic evidence, Booth “suddenly” confessed that he had, indeed, sexually assaulted the accuser, the complaint said.

Booth told police that “he hadn’t had sex in a while and was coming down from using ‘crystal meth.’”

The county police Internal Affairs Unit is investigating.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, [email protected] or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.