Archive

ShareThis Page
Allegheny County Jail sued for medical mistreatment of inmate | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County Jail sued for medical mistreatment of inmate

53285GuyauxGaryLynnSept2017
Allegheny County
Gary Lynn Guyaux

The sister of an Allegheny County Jail inmate is suing the county because she says her brother is not receiving the proper medical care.

Gary Guyaux, 66, of North Fayette suffers from congestive heart failure and has lost 30 pounds in the past six months at the jail, according to a lawsuit his sister, Christy Guyaux, filed Friday in federal court.

Guyaux arrived at the jail in April 2016. Guyaux was hospitalized, and medical staff determined his heart was working at only 12 percent of its capacity, the complaint said.

When he returned to the jail, he did not receive required medication or dietary restrictions, which caused his health to decline, the complaint said.

Guyaux also has become wheelchair-bound and has severe swelling, the complaint said.

The lawsuit, which names the county and jail Warden Orlando Harper as defendants, seeks an injunction for Guyaux to be held in an independent medical facility. It also seeks declaratory and monetary relief.

The lawsuit claims one count of “deliberate indifference to serious medical and mental health needs in violation of eighth amendment to the U.S. Constitution.”

Guyaux was indicted in September 2017 on four counts of receiving stolen property and 15 counts of possessing prohibited weapons after police seized 568 weapons at his North Fayette home.

In June, while in jail, Guyaux was convicted of one count of terroristic threats stemming from an incident while he was locked up.

Allegheny County spokeswoman Amie Downs declined to comment.

Theresa Clift is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Theresa at 412-380-5669, [email protected] or via Twitter @tclift.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.