Poll shows Conor Lamb with double-digit lead over Keith Rothfus |

Poll shows Conor Lamb with double-digit lead over Keith Rothfus

Wesley Venteicher
Fifty-one percent of potential voters support Lamb (right), compared to 39 percent for Rothfus, the poll shows.

Democrat Conor Lamb holds a double-digit lead over Republican Keith Rothfus in the race for the newly drawn 17th Congressional District northwest of Pittsburgh, according to a new Monmouth University poll.

Fifty-one percent of potential voters support Lamb, compared to 39 percent for Rothfus, according to the results. Nine percent were undecided. Monmouth polled a group of 401 people in the district who have either voted in an election since 2010 or who have recently registered to vote, and the margin of error was 6.8 percent.

Lamb, 34, of Mt. Lebanon won a special election in March to serve out the remainder of former Republican U.S. Rep. Tim Murphy’s term in the existing 18th Congressional District south of Pittsburgh. Since then, the state Supreme Court implemented a new congressional district map after ruling the old map had been unconstitutionally gerrymandered to benefit Republicans.

Rothfus, 56, of Sewickley has represented the 12th District since 2012, when he unseated incumbent Democratic U.S. Rep. Mark Critz.

“Rothfus knocked off a Democratic incumbent in 2012 largely due to a favorably drawn map. It looks like the new court-ordered map could be responsible for his defeat if these poll results hold,” Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute, said in a news release.

The court’s map creates the unusual situation of two incumbents facing one another, and each represents a portion of the new 17th District.

Even in the portion of the new district that Rothfus represents, poll results showed the two candidates within a percentage point of one another. In Lamb’s portion of the district, he leads Rothfus 54 percent to 37 percent, according to the poll.

In 2016, President Trump won in the 12th District by about 20 points, while he won in the areas that make up the new district by only two points, according to the release. Forty-four percent of the new district approves of Trump’s performance, while 51 percent disapprove, the results show.

The poll found 63 percent of respondents indicated it was important for them to cast a vote for a member of Congress that reflects how they feel about the president.

House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi could also factor into the race. Twenty-one percent of poll respondents said Lamb has been too supportive of Pelosi, while 35 percent said Lamb has offered the right amount of support.

Lamb announced during his 18th District campaign he wouldn’t vote for Pelosi to lead the House if elected.

The Monmouth poll was conducted by telephone from July 19 to 22. Fifty percent of the poll respondents were registered Democrats, while 38 percent were registered Republicans and 12 percent were registered with neither party, Monmouth said. When pollsters asked voters what party they identified with, 38 percent said they were Democrats, 34 percent said they were Republicans and 28 percent said they were independent.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.