ACLU Pennsylvania announces new campaign to end cash bail, fight mandatory minimums |

ACLU Pennsylvania announces new campaign to end cash bail, fight mandatory minimums

Wesley Venteicher
Reggie Shuford, executive director of ACLU Pennsylvania, announced a new grassroots campaign to end cash bail and prevent mandatory minimum sentences Thursday, July 26, 2018 at the Allegheny County Courthouse.

The ACLU announced a new Allegheny County campaign Thursday to end cash bail in the state and to prevent the return of mandatory minimum sentences for some drug offenses and violent crimes.

The organization is wading into grassroots organizing to address what it views as systemic racial disparities, citing statistics such as a 2015 Pitt study’s finding that nearly 50 percent of people in Allegheny County Jail are black, while black residents make up 13 percent of the county’s population.

“We’ve come to realize that litigation alone is not enough to effectively tackle mass incarceration and the racial disparities in the criminal justice system,” ACLU Pennsylvania Executive Director Reggie Shuford said in a news conference on the Allegheny County Courthouse steps.

Shuford said the cash bail system is fundamentally unfair because it keeps in jail the people who can’t afford bail while they await trial, often leading to social and economic consequences such as job losses for those people.

The Pitt study found that 81 percent of the people in Allegheny County Jail in December 2015 hadn’t been convicted of a crime, compared to a national average in jails of 62 percent who hadn’t been convicted.

The group wants those in the criminal justice system to use tools other than high bail amounts to keep dangerous criminals locked up.

It is opposing a push in the General Assembly to reinstate mandatory minimum sentences that the state Supreme Court struck down in 2015.

Allegheny County District Attorney Steven A. Zappala Jr. last year supported reinstating mandatory minimum sentences to use as a tool in investigating serious crimes and fighting the opioid epidemic.

Shuford said the group will talk with legislators along with court officials and others to try to make changes. The group will work to inform voters about district attorney candidates but won’t offer outright support or campaign funding for specific candidates, he said.

He cited police officer Michael Rosfeld’s June 19 shooting of 17-year-old Antwon Rose, Jr. in East Pittsburgh, saying the group will continue to respond to “crises in the moment” such as Rose’s shooting.

He said “people are finally paying attention” to criminal justice issues, making now the time to organize for change.

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.