Allegheny County Republicans select nominee for Hal English seat |

Allegheny County Republicans select nominee for Hal English seat

Wesley Venteicher
Lori Mizgorski

Allegheny County Republicans chose a Shaler commissioner Saturday to replace state Rep. Hal English in this fall’s 30th District election.

The party selected Lori Mizgorski, 51, who is English’s chief of staff, in a closed-to-the-public meeting Saturday at the Hampton Inn in Harmar.

Forty-nine Republican Committee of Allegheny County members attended the meeting, according to a Saturday news release. The party did not disclose the names of the candidates Mizgorski might have defeated in balloting at the meeting or how many committee members voted for her.

English announced July 3 that he wouldn’t pursue re-election this fall. The announcement came after May’s primary, in which voters could have picked his replacement instead of the party had he made the announcement earlier.

In the announcement, English said only that he wanted to devote more time to his family and his elder law practice.

Mizgorski now mounts a campaign with less than 100 days until the election against Betsy Monroe, a former supervisor at insurer Highmark Inc. who won a three-way Democratic Party primary.

Monroe’s campaign criticized the Republican Party’s selection process in a statement Saturday, in which Monroe asked, “Why doesn’t the Republican committee appreciate competition and trust the democratic process?”

Allegheny County Republican Party Chairman D. Raja said in a Saturday statement that Mizgorski is “a superbly qualified candidate who will do an incredible job as the next representative for the people of 30th Legislative District.”

English sent a statement saying he hired Mizgorski five years ago due to her “passion for (the) community and a desire to serve it.”

Wes Venteicher is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Wes at 412-380-5676, [email protected] or via Twitter @wesventeicher.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.