ShareThis Page
Mercer County man indicted on federal drug charge |

Mercer County man indicted on federal drug charge

| Wednesday, August 1, 2018 5:45 p.m

A federal grand jury in Pittsburgh has indicted a Mercer County man alleging he violated the federal narcotics laws, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said today.

Henry A. Bruce, 38, of Farrell, is named in the one-count indictment returned July 31.

According to the indictment, Bruce possessed with the intent to distribute 28 grams or more of crack cocaine on or about June 28.

Authorities seized about $19,000 in cash and a black Cadillac from Bruce when they arrested him, the indictment said. Prosecutors are seeking to have both forfeited to the government.

Assistant United States Attorneys Rebecca L. Silinski and Troy Rivetti are serving as prosecutors in the case.

Bruce’s arraignment and a detention hearing are scheduled for Friday morning in Pittsburgh. He will be detained until then.

A federal public defender has been appointed to represent him.

The Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General, the Mercer County Drug Task Force and the Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted the investigation.

According to court records, Bruce was arrested in a cocaine sales conspiracy in 2007. He pleaded guilty to two charges and was sentenced to serve 10 years in prison followed by eight years of probation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.