ShareThis Page
Ingram man accused of shopping scam faces decades behind bars |

Ingram man accused of shopping scam faces decades behind bars

| Thursday, August 9, 2018 3:15 p.m.

An Ingram man faces up to six decades behind bars after prosecutors say he scammed multiple victims out of over $40,000 through a mystery shopper scheme, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady announced Thursday.

Robert Shon Jackson, 42, of Mainsgate Street, is named as the sole defendant in a three count indictment unsealed Wednesday.

According to prosecutors, Jackson led victims to believe they were hired to evaluate business and retail services for which they were sent money to make purchases.

Those victims, prosecutors say, were actually being sent counterfeit money orders and checks. Once those checks were deposited in a victim’s account, excess funds not used for mystery shopping were to be sent back to Jackson. When the victims’ banks discovered the checks and money orders were false, the victims were on the hook for the bounced transactions.

According to prosecutors, Jackson stole more than $42,000 before he was caught.

Jackson faces up to 60 years in prison, a fine of $750,000 or both, according to prosecutors.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul E. Hull is prosecuting the case.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Matthew at 724-226-4675, or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.