ShareThis Page
Northside Pittsburgh man accused of buying guns for others |

Northside Pittsburgh man accused of buying guns for others


A North Side man is accused of making false statements to gun dealers to illegally buy guns for other people, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Sean Jamar Gaines, 28, of the 1700 block of Belleau Drive, Pittsburgh, is facing 10 charges for allegedly making false statements to firearms dealers and writing false information on federal gun purchase applications between July 30, 2014 and Sept. 23, 2017.

He is accused of buying four semi-automatic Glock handguns, which were 9mm or 40-caliber, and one Ruger revolver .357-Magnumr from a store along Chartiers Avenue in McKees Rocks.

Gaines is accused of “knowingly making a false statement intending to deceive” the gun dealer each time. He then allegedly provided the guns to other people not allowed to own them.

Gaines’ indictment was returned by a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh on Tuesday but not made public until the Wednesday.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy M. Lanni is prosecuting the case and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives conducted the investigation.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.