ShareThis Page
NFL calls Steelers’ deflated football ‘defective’ |

NFL calls Steelers’ deflated football ‘defective’

The Steelers’ Landry Jones huddles with the offense during the first half of a preseason NFL football game against the Philadelphia Eagles, Thursday, Aug. 9, 2018, in Philadelphia.

Following a report that the Steelers used a deflated football in the third quarter of their exhibition game against the Philadelphia Eagles, the NFL said the ball was “defective.”

Howard Eskin of Sports Radio WIP, who serves as sideline reporter for Eagles games, tweeted Friday morning that the NFL was “investigating” a ball that was “VERY deflated.” The Steelers beat the Eagles, 31-14, Thursday night at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia.

Eskin later reported that the ball was used in the third quarter of the game at Lincoln Financial Field, when rookie Mason Rudolph was playing quarterback for the Steelers. Eskin tweeted that he saw the ball after an incompletion and “it was like a marshmallow.”

NFL spokesman Michael Signora issued the following statement: “All footballs were in compliance with NFL rules following the pregame inspection process and all proper procedures were followed. In the third quarter, a football that was found to be defective was removed from play and will be sent back to Wilson for review.”

The New England Patriots were at the center of a controversy that became known as Deflategate in 2015, when the league found that at least one football didn’t meet the required 12.5 to 13.5 PSI (pounds per square inch) in the AFC championship game victory over the Indianapolis Colts.

The NFL suspended Patriots quarterback Tom Brady four games, which he served during the 2016 season, fined the team $1 million and forced it to forfeit two draft picks.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Kevin at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.