ShareThis Page
Professor: Priest scandal is criminal; excommunication not a solution |

Professor: Priest scandal is criminal; excommunication not a solution


Calls for excommunication of clergymen named in the statewide Catholic sexual abuse grand jury report would likely not have the desired effect and not solve church’s accountability problems, according to a religious studies expert.

Rather, excommunication has historically been used to reunite offenders with the Catholic community and bring them back to the faith. A 2013 piece in the Catholic Herald, a United Kingdom-based Catholic newspaper, described the process as a “shock tactic” generally used in an effort to “bring people back to God.”

“I don’t think that excommunication would really be an answer to anything,” said Paula Kane, chair of Catholic Studies in the University of Pittsburgh’s Religious Studies Department.

Excommunicating the named priests misses the point, Kane said. She called it a form of social ostracizing and an internal punishment.

“These are people guilty of criminal offenses,” she said. “This was criminal behavior.”

Excommunication can be lifted when the offender repents, she said. Any priest excommunicated could regain their standing in the church. Even those who are excommunicated can attend Mass, but they cannot receive the Holy Sacrament.

“Yes, they could say the prayers and say, ‘I was wrong,’ and be restored to their priestly duties, but what good would that serve?” Kane said.

The Catholic Herald piece, which aims to lay out the process and effects of excommunication, indicates that the priests named in the grand jury report might not fall under automatic excommunication, which is one of two types of excommunication laid out in the Code of Canon Law – the system of laws and principles in the church.

There are certain actions that incur automatic excommunication under canon law, according to the report:

• Apostasy, or the abandonment of the Catholic faith

• Heresy, or the doubt or denial of a Catholic belief

• Schism, or disregarding the authority within the church

• Desecration of the Blessed Sacrament

• Physically attacking the Pope

• A priest who absolves an accomplice in violating the Sixth Commandment (thou shall not commit adultery)

• Consecrating a bishop without papal permission

• Abortion

• Violating the seal of the confessional

The other, less common form of excommunication comes from a decree by a Catholic authority after a process or trial, according to the Catholic Herald.

Rather than excommunication, Kane pointed to the recommendations laid out in the grand jury report: eliminate the statute of limitations for child sexual abuse; prohibit non-disclosure agreements that hinder cooperation with law enforcement; clarify punishments for not reporting suspected child abuse; and create a two-year window during which sex abuse victims who previously could not file lawsuits can do so.

“I guess maybe the issue here is that many Catholics don’t appreciate that the church went astray when it assumed this was only an internal matter,” Kane said. “An internal solution to the problem is only treating part of the problem.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.