Pittsburgh Promise adds new college partners |

Pittsburgh Promise adds new college partners


With 2400 college graduates and counting among its 8,000 scholarship recipients, the Pittsburgh

Promise scholarship organziation has forged partnerships with three additional universities that pledged to offer additional aid to Promise recipients.

Clarion and Edinboro universities and Juniata College recently joined 21 other schools across Pennsylvania that have pledged to provide grants for room and board as well as academic supports to Promise –eligible students from Pittsburgh Public’s class of 2019

Launched a decade ago, the Promise has provided $120 million in scholarships to Pittsburgh Public School graduates for up to four years of college or trade school

While the maximum amount of Promise scholarships has wavered from a high of $10,000 a year for four years to a low of $5,000 a year for the class of 2018, a growing number of colleges have stepped forward to offer additional aid to Promise recipients.

Other colleges that have pledged to offer assistance to Promise recipients include: Allegheny College, Carlow University, Carnegie Mellon University, Chatham University, Duquesne University, Geneva College,

Grove City College, Indiana University of Pennsylvania, La Roche College, Penn State (select campuses), Pittsburgh Technical College, Point Park University, Robert Morris University, Saint Vincent College, Seton Hill University, Shippensburg University, Slippery Rock University, Susquehanna University, Thiel College, Washington & Jefferson College, Westminster College.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.