Free water dries up for city of Pittsburgh, zoo, Phipps |

Free water dries up for city of Pittsburgh, zoo, Phipps

Bob Bauder
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
A statue of Fame sits atop the 1871 Soldiers Memorial overlooking Lake Elizabeth in the West Park section of Allegheny Commons, Monday, August 18, 2014.
Stephanie Strasburg | Trib Total Media
Kids swim in the Highland Swimming Pool in Highland Park.

Pittsburgh government has never paid a water bill, but that’s about to change.

The Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority is set to begin a “robust” meter replacement campaign that will include all city offices and facilities for the first time, plus related public attractions such as the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium and Phipps Conservancy.

PWSA Executive Director Robert Weimar said the authority plans to replace 6,000 water meters each year. He couldn’t give a time frame for when Pittsburgh would start receiving bills but said they’re coming in the future.

“Everybody is going to get metered. Everybody is going to get a bill,” Weimar said in a recent interview. “The city is going to have to start paying for water. We’re going to get a water bill, too. We will pay the water bill for this building.”

PWSA pays for water used at its Penn Avenue headquarters through its rent, Weimar said.

Pittsburgh officials did not return calls for comment.

Pennsylvania Auditor General Eugene DePasquale last year estimated that PWSA pumps about 600 million gallons of water per year into 400 city-owned properties, including City Hall, swimming pools, parks and leaky Lake Elizabeth at Allegheny Commons Park on the North Side. He estimated that the city water bill in 2017 would have totaled $6.8 million.

DePasquale said PWSA is unsure of exactly how much water it provides the city because 90 percent of city-owned properties aren’t metered.

Other unmetered sites include the Pittsburgh Zoo and PPG Aquarium in Highland Park and Phipps Conservatory in Oakland.

Zoo spokeswoman Tracy Gray declined comment. Phipps did not return a call requesting comment.

The free water is among a long list of chronic problems that have plagued PWSA for decades and prompted state lawmakers this year to place the authority under PUC oversight.

PWSA is now addressing PUC questions and amping up its capital improvement program to fix leaking pipes and outdated infrastructure, some of which that dates back more than 100 years.

Among the PUC questions are PWSA’s annual $7.1 million payment to the city for lease of the water system, which the city owns; the $3 million to $5 million PWSA pays Alcosan each year for delinquent sewer bills; and a $4.8 million subsidy PWSA pays each year to Pennsylvania American Water, which supplies residents in Pittsburgh’s South Hills.

Alcosan’s monthly sewage treatment charges are attached to PWSA bills, and PWSA is responsible for collections and delinquencies under an agreement dating to the 1950s. Pittsburgh City Council in 1973 agreed to subsidize the difference between PWSA’s rates and higher rates charged by Pennsylvania American Water so all city residents pay the same rates.

Weimar said PWSA is negotiating a new agreement with the city that addresses its annual payment. He said it has discussed the Alcosan delinquencies with the PUC and is waiting for the commission for advice on how to address that. He said PWSA would argue that the South Hills subsidy should end.

“What the PUC has said to us is you should pay for the services that you get,” Weimar said. “I think everyone questions the validity of having one side of the city compensate the other for water service. People ought to pay for what services they get. That’s going to be our position.”

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.