Archive

ShareThis Page
Pet salon owner blames Pittsburgh council president for parking pylons | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Pet salon owner blames Pittsburgh council president for parking pylons

185837diamondintheruffbumpout
City crews install a bump out in front of Dimonad in the Ruff at 18th and Mary streets in the South Side.

A South Side businesswoman says Pittsburgh City Council President Bruce Kraus ordered the city to install no-parking pylons around the front of her business to harass her, but officials maintain the installation is part of a citywide traffic safety program.

Christine Marburger owns the pet grooming business, A Diamond in the Ruff, on South 18th Street next door to Kraus’ home. She said she arrived at work on Thursday to find Department of Public Works employees installing the pylons that resemble those used to separate city bike lanes. She said Kraus has a history of hassling her.

“They told me it was a work order that was sent in by Bruce Kraus and approved by Bruce Kraus,” she said. “Being that I’ve had issues with him in the past, it just seems like he has this vendetta against me and this is just another little dig at me.”

Kraus countered that the pylons were implemented by the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure as part of a safety improvement program where 18th Street intersects with Mary, Sarah, Jane and Josephine streets.

“Bruce Kraus had nothing to do with installing this,” said Dan Gilman, Mayor Bill Peduto’s chief of staff. “It’s completely and utterly untrue. Council members do not give orders to public works employees, and public works employees do not take orders from council members.”

Gilman said the city has been installing similar pylons and painting lines designating no parking areas at dozens of street corners across the city, including in the Strip District, Oakland, Uptown and Squirrel Hill.

“These are being installed at intersections where we have had a large number of crashes and other safety issues,” he said. “Making sure cars don’t park too close to an intersection makes it safe for cars and pedestrians alike.”

Marburger said she understood there were safety concerns about the intersection, but the city could have alleviated that with stop signs.

“Tell me why this barrier was put up around my building,” she said. “It’s just too much of a coincidence considering my past issues with him.”

City police in 2014 cited Kraus with harassment and littering , alleging he dumped garbage on the front steps of A Diamond in the Ruff. Kraus denied the allegations. District Judge Jim Motznik, a former councilman who served with Kraus, dismissed the charges .

South Side Chamber of Commerce President Mark Bucklaw said he was unaware of the safety program and didn’t know of any other intersections in the neighborhood with pylons.

“My question would be what makes that corner unique compared to other corners,” he said.

Gilman said the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure determined where pylons should be installed. They’re also scheduled for installation at an intersection on 40th Street.

“These are being installed all over the city,” Gilman said.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.