Le’Veon Bell jersey sales dropping in latest Dick’s Sporting Goods report |

Le’Veon Bell jersey sales dropping in latest Dick’s Sporting Goods report

Joe Rutter
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Le’Veon Bell avoids the Texans’ Marcus Gilchrist on a run in the first quarter Monday, Dec. 25, 2017, at NRG Stadium in Houston.

Le’Veon Bell is gone, and he’s apparently starting to be forgotten by fans when it comes to NFL jersey sales.

Bell’s jersey has dropped from No. 19 to No. 57 in sales for the 2018 season, according to the Dick’s Sporting Goods Jersey Report that was released Wednesday.

The Pittsburgh Steelers running back remains in Miami while deciding when he will sign his $14.544 million franchise-tag tender. Bell already has forfeited two weeks of salary – $1.71 million combined – because of his absence.

Five Steelers teammates rank ahead of Bell on the jersey report. Wide receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster has surged 35 spots to No. 8. He’s one spot ahead of wide receiver Antonio Brown.

Running back James Conner ranks No. 31 and linebacker T.J. Watt is No. 48.

While Bell ranks No. 57, he at least ahead of quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, whose jersey sales rank No. 59.

Other Steelers players listed in the top 100 are tackle Alejandro Villanueva (No. 76) and linebacker Ryan Shazier (No. 92).

Eagles quarterback Carson Wentz has the best-selling jersey for the season.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at [email protected] or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.