ShareThis Page
Wilkinsburg man guilty of heroin-fentanyl operation at Monroeville hotel |

Wilkinsburg man guilty of heroin-fentanyl operation at Monroeville hotel

A Wilkinsburg man has pleaded guilty to conspiring to sell more than 200 grams of heroin and fentanyl after officials caught his drug-dealing crew operating out of a Monroeville hotel, federal prosecutors in Pittsburgh said Tuesday.

Termane Thomass Eleam, 32, was convicted on one federal drug charge, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady said.

Eleam faces up a maximum sentence of up to 20 years in prison, a fine up to $20 million or both.

According to prosecutors, officers with Homeland Security and state and Monroeville police executed a search warrant for two specific rooms at the Days Inn in Monroeville on Nov. 3, 2016.

While searching one room, investigators found two men and suspected heroin, gloves, packaging materials, blenders and several cellphones.

In the second room, officials found a cousin of Eleam “bagging the suspected heroin in exchange for payment,” Brady said.

The drugs later tested positive for about 200 grams of heroin and furanyl fentanyl, an analogue of fentanyl, prosecutors said.

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid painkiller that can be 50 to 100 times stronger than heroin. As little as 2 or 3 nanograms per milliliter of blood of fentanyl can be deadly.

Eleam, who had left the Days Inn shortly before officials arrived, returned to the hotel during the search, prosecutors said. They searched him and his car and found marijuana and drug paraphernalia.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Shanicka L. Kennedy prosecuted the case.

U.S. District Judge Nora Barry Fischer has scheduled a sentencing for March.

Natasha Lindstrom is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Natasha at 412-380-8514, or via Twitter @NewsNatasha.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.