ShareThis Page
$5,000 reward offered for info on Brookline cat impaled by arrow |

$5,000 reward offered for info on Brookline cat impaled by arrow

A $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the person who fired an arrow into a cat named Ollie last week in Brookline. Pittsburgh police say the cat’s owners took their pet to an animal hospital for treatment but he had to be euthanized because the arrow punctured its lung.

An animal rights organization is offering a $5,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the person who fired an arrow into a cat in Brookline last week.

The reward is being offered by the organization People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

Pittsburgh Police Officer Christine Luffy, who investigates animal cruelty cases, said Nathan Orr and his fiancee, Kearston Knapp, reported hearing what sounded like cats fighting outside the front door of their Elmbank Street home at about 4 p.m. Saturday.

The couple opened the door and found their pet cat, Ollie, with an arrow through its body, Luffy said.

The family took the cat to an animal hospital for treatment, but the pet had to be euthanized because the arrow pierced its chest and punctured its lung.

The couple told Luffy that the incident was traumatic for their kids, ages 6 and 3.

Luffy has been canvassing the neighborhood seeking information about the incident.

To reach report any information connected with the case, call Luffy at 412-488-8425.

Tony LaRussa is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Tony at 724-772-6368 or [email protected] or via Twitter @TonyLaRussaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.