Judge seals evidence in accused synagogue gunman Robert Bowers case |

Judge seals evidence in accused synagogue gunman Robert Bowers case

Aaron Aupperlee
Robert Bowers

Evidence in the case against the accused gunman in the Squirrel Hill synagogue shooting will be sealed as attorneys on both sides prepare for trial.

Attorneys for Robert Bowers, people assisting with his case and potential witnesses or lawyers for those witnesses can see evidence in the case, Federal District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose ruled Monday.

Evidence cannot be made public and any evidence filed with the court will be sealed.

Bowers, 46, faces a 44-count federal indictment for allegedly killing 11 people inside the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh during services Oct. 27. More than half of the charges against him carry a possible death sentence.

Bowers last week pleaded not guilty to the charges.

U.S. Attorney Scott Brady filed a motion Friday asking that all discovery materials in the case be sealed . The attorneys representing Bowers did not object to the motion.

Aaron Aupperlee is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Aaron at 412-336-8448, [email protected] or via Twitter @tinynotebook.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.