Archive

Allegheny County voters reject Children’s Fund referendum | TribLIVE.com
Allegheny

Allegheny County voters reject Children’s Fund referendum

Bob Bauder
416043courthouse

Allegheny County voters on Tuesday rejected a ballot question seeking a 0.25-mill property tax increase to fund children’s programming across the county, including preschool and meals for underprivileged children.

With all of the county’s precincts reporting results, 52 percent of voters opposed the tax increase while 48 percent supported it, according to unofficial tallies.

The referendum asked voters to approve an amendment to the Allegheny County Home Rule Charter that would create the Allegheny County Children’s Fund and levy a 0.25-mill tax increase on all properties in the county.

The tax hike would have amounted to $25 for each $100,000 of a property’s assessed value. It was expected to generate about $18 million annually to fund preschool and after-school programming and meals for underprivileged children.

Supporters hailed the initiative as critical to providing support for needy kids and necessary for their success later in life.

Opponents criticized the proposal as a slush fund. They said it was unnecessary because government already provides funding for children’s programming.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.