1 Tree of Life victim released, 2 remain hospitalized |

1 Tree of Life victim released, 2 remain hospitalized

Megan Guza
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
People leave flowers and take a moment to remember the 11 individuals who were killed at the mass shooting at Tree of Life congregation on Monday, Oct. 28, 2018.
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Flowers and notes are left to commemorate the 11 individuals who were killed at the mass shooting at Tree of Life congregation on Monday, Oct. 28, 2018.

A woman injured in the mass shooting at Tree of Life synagogue has been released from the hospital, according to a tweet from UPMC.

Andrea Wedner, 61, was released from UPMC Presbyterian on Tuesday, according to the tweet. She’d been shot in the arm.

Wedner’s mother, 97-year-old Rose Mallinger, was among the 11 killed in the Oct. 27 shooting.

Daniel Leger, 70, remains hospitalized in stable condition. Leger suffered critical gunshot injuries to his chest, according to his brother, Paul Leger. He has undergone several surgeries.

SWAT operator Timothy Matson is the only police officer still hospitalized. He, too, is in stable condition after being shot seven times by accused gunman Robert Bowers. Bowers opened fire on the third floor of the synagogue as SWAT officers searched for victims.

Three other Pittsburgh officers — two patrolmen and another SWAT operator — were injured by gunfire in the shooting. They have since been released.

Bowers, 46, remains in federal custody. He is facing 44 federal charges, half of which of punishable by death. The Allegheny County District Attorney also filed three dozen charges against Bowers, including 11 counts of homicide.

Bowers pleaded not guilty last week in federal court. He has requested a jury trial.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.