ShareThis Page
Social Security fraud nets woman home detention, probation |

Social Security fraud nets woman home detention, probation

A federal judge sentenced a Greene County woman to probation for Social Security fraud.

Cindy Hancheck, 62, of Carmichaels was sentenced to four years of probation and one year of home detention, plus restitution of $115,597.94, U.S. Attorney Scott W. Brady announced Wednesday.

According to prosecutors, from 1999 to 2002, Hancheck made a series of false statements to the Social Security Administration, such as falsely claiming her husband had left her home and she did not know his whereabouts. Between 1999 and 2016, Hancheck failed to disclose her husband’s continued presence in her household and his continued financial support of her, with the intent to fraudulently secure Supplemental Security Income benefits, authorities said.

Also, from January 2000 to February 2016, Hancheck received $115,597.94 in Supplemental Security Income benefits to which she knew she was not entitled.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam N. Hallowell prosecuted this case.

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.