Michael Rosfeld requesting outside jury for trial in Antwon Rose shooting |

Michael Rosfeld requesting outside jury for trial in Antwon Rose shooting

Megan Guza
Michael Rosfeld

An East Pittsburgh police officer charged with homicide in the June killing of an unarmed teenager has filed a motion seeking to have the case heard by a jury from outside of Allegheny County, court records show.

Michael Rosfeld, 30, and his attorney, Patrick Thomassey, filed the motion Friday seeking a change of venue or a change of venire. The former would move the trial to a different county, while the latter would mean a jury would be brought in from a different county.

The trial is scheduled to begin Feb. 26.

Rosfeld shot and killed 17-year-old Antwon Rose II as he ran from a felony traffic stop in East Pittsburgh on June 19. Rosfeld shot him three times: in the arm, in the back and in the head.

Rose was a passenger in a car suspected in a drive-by shooting minutes before the killing in nearby North Braddock. Police say the car had gunshot damage to its rear window, likely from the earlier shooting. As Rosfeld ordered the driver to the ground, Rose and backseat passenger Zaijuan Hester fled on foot, authorities said.

Witnesses told police that Rose briefly showed his empty hands before he ran from the car. District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. filed one homicide charge against Rosfeld a week later.

Thomassey had previously stated his intention to file a motion for a change of venire or venue because the killing touched off weeks of protests across the county.

“There’s been so much consternation in this city,” Thomassey said in September. “We’ve had tie-ups of traffic, there have been people attacked, people pulled out of cars — it’s gotten a lot of attention. I mean, they picketed a judge’s home, and people in this county, I think, would be afraid to sit on a jury in this case.”

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, [email protected] or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.