Norfolk Southern determines broken rail caused Station Square derailment in August |

Norfolk Southern determines broken rail caused Station Square derailment in August

Bob Bauder
Crews working to remove Norfolk Southern freight cars that derailed August 5, 2018, from a track near Station Square.

A freight train that tumbled over tracks at Station Square in August, barely missing a Port Authority of Allegheny County light rail station and disrupting T service from the station for weeks, was caused by a broken rail, Norfolk Southern has determined.

The company issued a report to the Federal Railroad Administration that determined the cause was a broken rail and estimated the Aug. 5 mishap caused the railroad about $853,000 in damages to equipment and track.

The organization is still investigating the incident, FRA spokeswoman Desiree French said, and will issue a separate report in the future.

“The railroad was required to submit an accident report to FRA,” she said in an email. “FRA’s investigation of the Station Square derailment … is ongoing.”

Norfolk Southern spokesman Rudy Husband said the company doesn’t know how the rail damage occurred. He said the company is required to inspect main line tracks twice weekly and inspected the track in question just before the train derailed.

“We don’t know when the defect occurred,” Husband said. “We have a very robust track inspection program. We inspect our track on a very regular basis because derailments are bad for business.”

Seven freight cars loaded with household products and appliances tumbled off tracks above the Station Square stop, damaging about 1,000 feet of railroad track, 1,600 feet of light rail track and 4,000 feet of power lines.

Port Authority spokesman Adam Brandolph declined to comment on the report, but said the derailment caused significant damages and the agency is still calculating the total. Brandolph said the Port Authority intends to bill Norfolk Southern.

“We anticipate submitting a package tallying those costs to them by the end of the year,” he said. “We had significant costs both internally and costs that we shopped out, contractors that we paid for, things like that.”

Falling debris just missed the light rail station and the Port Authority credited fare taker Princess Ferguson with quickly directing several passengers to evacuate.

It took weeks for the Port Authority to replace the track and electric lines, rebuild a portion of a concrete retaining wall near the T stop and reinstall a power line support structure. The derailment clogged freight routes along the Norfolk Southern system between the East Coast and Chicago and caused significant delays for T passengers.

Bob Bauder is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Bob at 412-765-2312, [email protected] or via Twitter @bobbauder.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.