ShareThis Page
Floridian pleads guilty in credit card fraud scheme |

Floridian pleads guilty in credit card fraud scheme

| Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:33 p.m

A Florida man pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh to conspiracy to commit bank, wire and mail fraud in an illegal credit card payment scheme, federal prosecutors said Thursday.

Gennady Nudelman, 42, of Boca Raton, is accused of being part of a conspiracy to fraudulently process credit card payments, the U.S. Attorney in Pittsburgh said.

The defendant conspired to prevent credit card companies from learning that their products and services to pay for prohibited activities and to subvert the internal controls the credit card companies used to detect and prevent this type of activity.

The fraud involved establishing shell corporations and websites associated with the shell companies that falsely claimed that they sold products other than pharmaceutical drugs or products that violated trademark infringement laws.

The conspirators got merchant accounts from the credit card companies in the names of the shell corporations and the fake websites. Those accounts were used to process payments for pharmaceutical drugs or products that violated trademark infringement laws, prosecutors said.

The conspirators even set up a telephone bank to receive calls from customers questioning billings on their credit card statements, and the conspirators explained to the customers the true nature of the transactions in hopes of avoiding charge-backs that could cause the credit card companies to question the legitimacy of the transactions.

Nudelamn is scheduled to be sentenced before Judge David Cercone on April 29. He could face up to 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine.


Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.