Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt doubles Maryland Eastern Shore’s trouble in 78-43 victory | TribLIVE.com
News

Pitt doubles Maryland Eastern Shore’s trouble in 78-43 victory

Tribune-Review
| Saturday, December 15, 2018 4:03 p.m

Pitt completed Maryland Eastern Shore’s miserable three-day stay in Pittsburgh, running away with a 78-43 victory Saturday at Petersen Events Center.

The Hawks (1-10) lost at Duquesne on Thursday night, 72-57.

Maryland Eastern Shore’s 43 points were the fewest allowed by Pitt since an 84-43 victory against Saint Joseph’s College on Nov. 17, 2015.

For Pitt (8-3), it was the Panthers’ first dominant performance in a month and only their second victory since Nov. 21.

Freshman guard Xavier Johnson led Pitt in scoring with 12 points, stretching his career-opening streak of double-figure scoring to 11 games. Jared Wilson-Frame and Terrell Brown, neither of whom were in the starting lineup, scored 11 and 10 points, respectively, for Pitt.

Maryland Eastern Shore scored the first five points of the game, but it was a mere tease for anyone looking for a competitive game.

Over the next 7 minutes, 12 seconds, Pitt went on a 26-3 run, scoring in several different manners.

Johnson and McGowens hit 3-pointers, Toney aggressively hustled into position for an offensive rebound and scored on the follow, Terrell Brown dunked and Khameron Davis came off the bench to record his first points (four) since the Iowa game Nov. 27.

Twice, Pitt led by 21 in the first half, including 38-17 at halftime.

Pitt started the second half on a 9-0 run and built a 47-17 lead at 17:16.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.