ShareThis Page
Ex-Turtle Creek woman sentenced to federal prison for identity theft, gun violations |

Ex-Turtle Creek woman sentenced to federal prison for identity theft, gun violations

Renatta Signorini
| Monday, December 17, 2018 2:36 p.m

A former Turtle Creek resident was sentenced Monday in federal court to nine years and eight months in prison for numerous crimes, including hacking into celebrities’ social media accounts, according to a news release.

Quinyahta Rochelle, 32, will be supervised for three years after imprisonment, U.S. Attorney Scott Brady said in the news release. She was sentenced for several offenses including conspiracy to commit identity theft, wire fraud, unauthorized use of counterfeit driver’s licenses and credit cards.

Rochelle accessed social media accounts belonging to various celebrities between March and July 2016. That led investigators to execute a search warrant, where they found several stolen firearms and rounds of ammunition at her home, according to the release. She was a convicted felon at the time, authorities said.

Investigators learned after another search warrant that Rochelle obtained identification information to make counterfeit credit cards and driver’s licenses which were used to make purchases and apply for credit cards, according to the release. She pleaded guilty in July.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.