ShareThis Page
Post-Gazette’s top editor to retire at year’s end |

Post-Gazette’s top editor to retire at year’s end

Megan Guza
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 3:06 p.m
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
The offices of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on the North Shore on March 20, 2017.

Longtime Pittsburgh Post-Gazette executive editor David Shribman will retire at the end of the year, according to the union representing the newspaper’s reporters.

“David has always been a friend to the newsroom and we’re left wondering, ‘What happens now?’” the Newspaper Guild of Pittsburgh said in a tweet late Tuesday morning.

Guild president Michael Fuoco said in an email he was out of town and had no comment.

Shribman became executive editor of the Post-Gazette in 2003, coming from The Boston Globe where he was an assistant managing editor and Washington bureau chief. He won a Pulitzer Prize for journalism in 1995.

A spokesperson for the Post-Gazette did not immediately return requests for comment.

“We can only hope the Blocks use common sense and replace David with someone who will fight for PG journalists and not be a yes-person to (Block Communications),” the guild said in Tweet.

The guild has frequently clashed with the newspaper’s ownership, Block Communications, and union employees have been without a contract for nearly two years.

Megan Guza is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 412-380-8519, or via Twitter @meganguzaTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.