East Pittsburgh mayor: Regional police force ‘probably going to happen’ |

East Pittsburgh mayor: Regional police force ‘probably going to happen’

Natasha Lindstrom
Nate Smallwood | Tribune-Review
Mayor of East Pittsburgh, Louis Payne, looks on during a East Pittsburgh Borough Council meeting on Tuesday, Oct. 16, 2018.

East Pittsburgh officials remain optimistic about collaborating with neighboring municipalities to develop a regional police force.

The borough of about 1,800 people disbanded its police department less than a month ago and has been relying on state police to patrol the community.

Mayor Louis Payne and council members say they’re hopeful momentum is mounting for nearby municipal officials to pool resources and form a single, larger police force charged with serving multiple communities. They’ve reached out to the Turtle Creek Valley Council of Governments, state representatives and invited more than a dozen local municipalities to begin discussions early next year.

“We have five (municipalities) ready to go for January,” Mayor Payne said Tuesday night, shortly after adjourning the first council meeting since the borough dissolved its police department. “We have big meetings coming up in January. It’s probably going to happen.”

Pennsylvania State Police began patrolling East Pittsburgh on Dec. 1, after receiving a formal letter from the borough requesting the service on Nov. 13.

But turning control over to state police is only supposed to be a temporary solution.

“Our initial goal was to merge with a larger municipality that employs full-time officers, but such an agreement would require intense planning as well as majority support from that municipality’s elected officials. These talks are still ongoing but have been slow-moving,” the borough wrote to residents in a letter announcing the decision.

Markus Adams, 54, who bought a home in the borough in 2012, said “one of the things that attracted me to East Pittsburgh was the local police presence” but he understands the cash-strapped borough’s need to rely on state police, at least for the short term.

“To disband the current agency, to bring in the state, I think that that was probably a good thing to do for a couple different reasons. One, it’s going to help to alleviate the pressure for taxes. Also, I think that it’s a good idea to maybe bring in some new faces, especially on a higher level of law enforcement, that would help to build trust,” Adams said.

At first, “it was a concern for me having law enforcement come from so far away, but up to this point, it seems like everything is under control,” Adams said.

Jonathan Reyes, 31, who bought a house in East Pittsburgh in March, said he understands the need for state police but didn’t like how quickly the change came about.

“The main thing that I feel about the transition is that it just came as a surprise and it was untransparent,” Reyes said.

The borough’s letter to residents said officials began talks with state police in September “after it became evident that other potential solutions would not be attainable in the immediate future.”

Among failed attempts, East Pittsburgh and North Braddock reached out to Allegheny County Police about patrolling the boroughs.

Talks fizzled in late September over staffing issues and costs. The county wanted $800,000 a year to take over policing for East Pittsburgh and $1.2 million for North Braddock — more than double what each had been spending on their police departments. East Pittsburgh, which on Tuesday adopted a $1.2 million budget for 2019, had been willing to put up $300,000.

The county’s policing estimates were higher in part because they pay their officers significantly more — on average, about $90,000 a year. East Pittsburgh and North Braddock each pay their part-time officers closer to $15 an hour.

“Most of the police officers we’ve hired in recent years have moved on to larger departments,” the borough said in its letter to residents, posted online Nov. 30. “We can no longer compete with larger police agencies offering full-time work with higher pay and benefits.”

State police are obligated to provide services at no cost to any municipality without its own law enforcement. About half the state’s more than 2,500 municipalities rely on state police for protection.

Borough officials have said they’ve been mulling disbanding their police force for years, but negotiations intensified following the June 19 fatal shooting of unarmed 17-year-old Antwon Rose II. Officer Michael Rosfeld faces a homicide charge in the shooting. His trial is scheduled for Feb. 26.

Rose’s death sparked protests across Allegheny County for weeks and spurred activists to call for improved training, accountability and use-of-force policies in place at the county’s more than 100 police departments.

Prior to Dec. 1, East Pittsburgh had been down to four part-time police officers and Chief Lori Fruncek for two months — half the number it had at the time of the Antown Rose shooting. Officers Nathaniel Calebro and Brian Jenks resigned in September, and officer Brian Neff resigned in October. Rosfeld remained on leave following the shooting until the department disbanded.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.