South Fayette approves rezoning request for planned grocery store |

South Fayette approves rezoning request for planned grocery store

What started out as a controversial project took a step forward with little more than a whimper.

South Fayette Commissioners approved rezoning 6.6 acres from business to commercial, enabling developers Burns & Scalo the opportunity to begin planning for a grocery store.

Two residents of nearby Freedom Drive South attended the commissioners meeting on May 10. Several residents attended previous meetings to voice displeasure with a proposed grocery store so close to their neighborhood.

The rezoning was approved with 2-1 vote. Commissioners Raymond Pitetti and Gwen Rodi voted in favor of the rezoning while Jessica Cardillo was opposed. Joseph Horowitz and Lisa Malosh were absent.

The rezoned property is at the southeast corner of Bursca Drive and Washington Pike, at the entrance to Bursca Business Park.

Gary and Doreen Fromholzer were the only residents of Freedom Drive South. Gary Fromholzer told commissioners he hopes they will look after the best interests of the Freedom Drive South residents when the project begins.

“All we ask is that you hold Mr. Scalo responsible for the promises he makes,” he said.

James Scalo, president of Burns & Scalo, previously told the residents and commissioners he also has been approached to build a seven-story hotel on the property, a project that would conform with the business zoning, but was less palatable to the residents.

Scalo said he preferred to see a supermarket at the spot. It is unknown what grocery store could be built there.

Eric Eisert is a Tribune-Review contributing writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.